翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Drexel University College of Computing and Informatics
・ Drexel University College of Engineering
・ Drexel University College of Medicine
・ Drexel University College of Nursing and Health Professions
・ Drexel University Sacramento
・ Drexel University School of Public Health
・ Drexel, Missouri
・ Drexel, North Carolina
・ Drexel, Ohio
・ Drexel-Alvernon, Arizona
・ Drexelbrook (SEPTA Route 101 station)
・ Drexeline (SEPTA Route 101 station)
・ Drexell R. Davis
・ Drexell's Class
・ Drexler
Drexler–Smalley debate on molecular nanotechnology
・ Drexmore (RTA Rapid Transit station)
・ Drey
・ Drey Wright
・ Dreya Weber
・ Dreydlekh
・ Dreye railway station
・ Dreyer
・ Dreyer & Reinbold Racing
・ Dreyer (crater)
・ Dreyer's
・ Dreyfoos School of the Arts
・ Dreyfus
・ Dreyfus (1930 film)
・ Dreyfus (1931 film)


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Drexler–Smalley debate on molecular nanotechnology : ウィキペディア英語版
Drexler–Smalley debate on molecular nanotechnology

The Drexler–Smalley debate on molecular nanotechnology was a public dispute between K. Eric Drexler, the originator of the conceptual basis of molecular nanotechnology, and Richard Smalley, a recipient of the 1996 Nobel prize in Chemistry for the discovery of the nanomaterial buckminsterfullerene. The dispute was about the feasibility of constructing molecular assemblers, which are molecular machines which could robotically assemble molecular materials and devices by manipulating individual atoms or molecules. The concept of molecular assemblers was central to Drexler's conception of molecular nanotechnology, but Smalley argued that fundamental physical principles would prevent them from ever being possible. The two also traded accusations that the other's conception of nanotechnology was harmful to public perception of the field and threatened continued public support for nanotechnology research.
The debate was carried out from 2001 to 2003 through a series of published articles and open letters. It began with a 2001 article by Smalley in ''Scientific American'', which was followed by a rebuttal published by Drexler and coworkers later that year, and two open letters by Drexler in early 2003. The debate was concluded in late 2003 in a "Point–Counterpoint" feature in ''Chemical & Engineering News'' in which both parties participated.
The debate has been often cited in the history of nanotechnology due to the fame of its participants and its commentary on both the technical and social aspects of nanotechnology. It has also been widely criticized for its adversarial tone, with Drexler accusing Smalley of publicly misrepresenting his work, and Smalley accusing Drexler of failing to understand basic science, causing commentators to go so far as to characterize the tone of the debate as similar to "a pissing match" and "reminiscent of () ''Saturday Night Live'' sketch".
==The participants==


抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Drexler–Smalley debate on molecular nanotechnology」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.